With reference to ancient South India, Korkai, Poompuhar and Muchiri were well known as [2023]
With reference to ancient South India, Korkai, Poompuhar and Muchiri were well known as [2023]
Read lessSign up to our innovative Q&A platform to pose your queries, share your wisdom, and engage with a community of inquisitive minds.
Log in to our dynamic platform to ask insightful questions, provide valuable answers, and connect with a vibrant community of curious minds.
Forgot your password? No worries, we're here to help! Simply enter your email address, and we'll send you a link. Click the link, and you'll receive another email with a temporary password. Use that password to log in and set up your new one!
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
The onset of the 13th century heralded the fragmentation of the once-mighty Chola and Chalukya empires, paving the way for the emergence of four distinct kingdoms within the region. To the south, the Pandyas and Hoysalas rose to prominence, while the northern territories saw the ascendance of the KaRead more
The onset of the 13th century heralded the fragmentation of the once-mighty Chola and Chalukya empires, paving the way for the emergence of four distinct kingdoms within the region. To the south, the Pandyas and Hoysalas rose to prominence, while the northern territories saw the ascendance of the Kakatiyas and Yadavas as influential powers. Simultaneously, the Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty was effectively eradicated from the political arena by the invading Ghaznavids in the early 11th century.
Following the disintegration of the Gurjara-Pratihara empire, no single state emerged to fill the void. Instead, a tapestry of smaller, independent powers took root, including the Gahadavalas in Kannauj, the Paramaras in Malwa, the Chalukyas in Gujarat, the Chauhans in Ajmer, the Tomars in Delhi, and the Chandellas in Bundelkhand, each vying for control and influence.
The timelines of these dynasties are noteworthy: the Hoysala dynasty thrived from the 10th to the 14th centuries, the Gahadavala rulers reigned during the 11th to 12th centuries, the Kakatiya rulers held power from the 12th to the 14th centuries, and the Yadava rulers dominated from the 12th to the 14th centuries.
See lessModernization and Westernization are related but distinct concepts, often confused due to their overlapping effects in many societies. Here’s how they differ: 1. Definition Modernization refers to the process of adopting new technologies, institutions, and practices to improve economic, political, aRead more
Modernization and Westernization are related but distinct concepts, often confused due to their overlapping effects in many societies. Here’s how they differ:
1. Definition
Modernization refers to the process of adopting new technologies, institutions, and practices to improve economic, political, and social development. It is a broad and universal concept that can occur in any society without necessarily adopting Western cultural values.
Westernization is the adoption of cultural, social, political, and economic norms associated with Western countries (primarily Europe and North America). It involves embracing Western lifestyles, clothing, language, governance models, and sometimes even ideologies.
2. Scope
Modernization focuses on technological advancement, industrialization, urbanization, and improved governance. It includes scientific progress, efficient administration, infrastructure development, and better healthcare and education.
Westernization involves cultural aspects such as wearing Western attire, eating fast food, speaking English, celebrating Western festivals, and following Western entertainment and social norms.
3. Dependency on Western Influence
Modernization does not necessarily mean adopting Western values. Countries like Japan, China, and South Korea have modernized while maintaining their unique cultural identities.
Westernization implies a shift towards Western culture, often replacing or overshadowing indigenous traditions.
4. Examples
Modernization Example: India’s use of digital banking, advancements in space technology, and smart city projects without losing its cultural heritage.
Westernization Example: The influence of Hollywood movies, Western fashion brands, and fast-food chains changing local habits and traditions.
5. Impact on Society
Modernization leads to progress in infrastructure, governance, and economic growth, allowing a country to compete globally while preserving its identity.
Westernization may result in cultural erosion, where local traditions and languages decline in favor of Western lifestyles.
Conclusion
Modernization is a global and necessary phenomenon for progress, while Westernization is a cultural shift that is optional and varies by society. A country can modernize without being Westernized, but Westernization often accompanies modernization due to globalization.
See lessThe Charter Act of 1833 made the Governor-General of Bengal the Governor-General of India. Key Provisions of the Act: Centralization of Power: It vested legislative power exclusively in the Governor-General in Council, thereby centralizing authority. First Governor-General of India: Lord William BenRead more
The Charter Act of 1833 made the Governor-General of Bengal the Governor-General of India.
This act marked a significant step in consolidating British rule in India.
See lessIn which year was the Indian Independence Act passed?
In which year was the Indian Independence Act passed?
Read lessThe Indian Independence Act was passed on 18th July 1947 by the British Parliament. This act paved the way for the partition of India and the creation of two independent dominions, India and Pakistan, effective from 15th August 1947. It marked the end of British rule in India and granted both nationRead more
The Indian Independence Act was passed on 18th July 1947 by the British Parliament. This act paved the way for the partition of India and the creation of two independent dominions, India and Pakistan, effective from 15th August 1947. It marked the end of British rule in India and granted both nations the power to govern themselves.
See lessWho among the following rulers of medieval Gujarat surrendered Diu to the Portuguese? [2023]
Who among the following rulers of medieval Gujarat surrendered Diu to the Portuguese? [2023]
Read lessThe correct answer is: Bahadur Shah. Explanation: Bahadur Shah, the Sultan of Gujarat, is the ruler who surrendered Diu to the Portuguese in the early 16th century. In 1535, Bahadur Shah faced a defeat against the Portuguese and, under pressure, surrendered Diu to them in exchange for peace. This evRead more
The correct answer is: Bahadur Shah.
Bahadur Shah, the Sultan of Gujarat, is the ruler who surrendered Diu to the Portuguese in the early 16th century.
It was Bahadur Shah who surrendered Diu to the Portuguese after facing defeat.
See lessThe Doctrine of Lapse was introduced by which British Governor-General?
The Doctrine of Lapse was introduced by which British Governor-General?
Read lessThe Doctrine of Lapse was introduced by Lord Dalhousie, who served as the Governor-General of India from 1848 to 1856. This policy allowed the British East India Company to annex Indian princely states if a ruler died without a natural male heir, disregarding the traditional practice of adopting heiRead more
The Doctrine of Lapse was introduced by Lord Dalhousie, who served as the Governor-General of India from 1848 to 1856. This policy allowed the British East India Company to annex Indian princely states if a ruler died without a natural male heir, disregarding the traditional practice of adopting heirs. Under this doctrine, several states, including Satara (1848), Jaitpur (1849), Sambalpur (1850), Udaipur (1852), Jhansi (1853), and Nagpur (1854), were annexed by the British. The policy was widely resented and became one of the causes of the Revolt of 1857.
See less
Puhar, also called Kaveripoompattinam, served as the chief port of the Cholas. Korkai was the principal harbor for the Pandyas, while the Chera kingdom relied on key ports such as Tondi and Muchiri for trade and commerce.
Puhar, also called Kaveripoompattinam, served as the chief port of the Cholas. Korkai was the principal harbor for the Pandyas, while the Chera kingdom relied on key ports such as Tondi and Muchiri for trade and commerce.
See less