The question of whether axions can account for dark matter is a complex issue that intersects with several fields of study, including cosmology, particle physics, and astrophysics. Constraints on dark matter, particularly axions, come from various sources, including the cosmic microwave background (CMB) power spectrum, large-scale galaxy surveys, and direct detection experiments like XENON1T, as well as astrophysical observations. Let’s break down the evidence and challenges related to axions as a potential dark matter candidate.

Axions as a Dark Matter Candidate

• Axions are hypothetical particles predicted by the Peccei-Quinn theory to solve the strong CP problem in quantum chromodynamics (QCD). These particles are ultra-light, and if they have the right properties, they could contribute to dark matter. Their extremely low mass and weak interactions with other particles make them an intriguing candidate for cold dark matter (CDM).

CMB Power Spectrum Constraints

• The CMB provides crucial insights into the early universe, particularly the fluctuations in the density of matter and radiation, which can be used to infer properties of dark matter. Key features of the CMB, like the angular power spectrum, depend on the density of different components of the universe, including dark matter.
• Axions (if they exist) can significantly affect the CMB power spectrum. Specifically:
  1. Axions as Cold Dark Matter (CDM): If axions make up dark matter, they would impact the early universe’s expansion rate and the growth of cosmic structures. Their presence would modify the sound horizon (the size of the largest sound waves in the early universe), which in turn would affect the CMB peaks.
  2. Axion Dark Matter Density: CMB data, particularly from Planck and WMAP missions, have been used to place upper limits on the density of axion-like particles (ALPs) in the universe. Constraints on dark matter from CMB observations suggest that axions could contribute to dark matter, but their mass must be extremely small (on the order of $10^{-22}eV10^\{-22\}\; \backslash text\{eV\}$10−22eV) for consistency with the observed CMB power spectrum.

Large-Scale Galaxy Surveys

• Surveys of large-scale cosmic structures, such as the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) measurements and the Lyman-alpha forest in quasar spectra, provide further constraints on the properties of dark matter.
  • Axions’ Influence on Structure Formation: The presence of axions as dark matter would have different effects on structure formation compared to other dark matter models. Specifically, axions (due to their small mass) would suppress structure formation at smaller scales compared to cold dark matter. This would leave a distinct signature in the distribution of galaxies, halos, and the clustering of large-scale structures.
  • Large-scale surveys, including data from SDSS and DES, have found no significant deviation from the predictions made by the standard CDM model. The lack of evidence for extra suppression of small-scale structure supports the idea that axions must have a very small mass to avoid disrupting the observed cosmic structures.

Direct Detection Experiments (XENON1T)

• Direct detection experiments, such as XENON1T, search for interactions between dark matter particles and the standard model of particles. These experiments are sensitive to weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs), but also test other candidates, including axions.
  • Axion Detection via Axion-Photon Coupling: Axions can interact with photons through an axion-photon coupling, a feature that allows axions to potentially be detected through photon conversion in strong magnetic fields.
  • XENON1T Results: In 2020, XENON1T set stringent limits on interactions between dark matter and nucleons, primarily aimed at WIMPs. However, its sensitivity to axions is less direct, though it has placed upper bounds on the possible axion-photon coupling, which limits the detectability of axions via direct detection experiments.
  • The mass of the axion affects how it could be detected. Ultra-light axions might not interact sufficiently in direct detection experiments like XENON1T, and the limits on axion-photon coupling are critical in determining whether axions are detectable in this manner.

Astrophysical Observations

• Axion-Photon Coupling: Astrophysical observations, such as the behavior of light passing through magnetic fields in galaxies or the supernova 1987A, can provide constraints on the axion-photon coupling constant. If axions are too efficient at converting into photons, they could have observable effects on stellar evolution or the cosmic microwave background.
  • Supernova 1987A: This supernova provided strong constraints on the axion’s interaction with photons. If axions were abundant and could efficiently convert into photons, they would carry away energy from the supernova, altering the light curve. The non-observation of such effects puts upper bounds on the axion-photon coupling.
  • Cosmic Magnetic Fields: Axion-photon interactions could also produce observable effects in galactic and intergalactic magnetic fields, but current astrophysical data have not shown any such evidence, further tightening the constraints on axion properties.

Challenges in Reconciling Findings

1. Mass Range and Detection: The mass of axions that would fit cosmological constraints from the CMB and large-scale surveys is extremely small (around $10^{-22}eV10^\{-22\}\; \backslash text\{eV\}$10−22eV). However, this small mass makes them very difficult to detect in direct detection experiments like XENON1T, which are designed for much heavier dark matter candidates like WIMPs.
2. Axion-Photon Coupling: The limits on the axion-photon coupling derived from astrophysical observations and direct detection experiments often conflict with the range needed for axions to be a significant dark matter component. If the axion-photon coupling is too strong, it would contradict astrophysical constraints, while if it’s too weak, axions may not be detectable by existing experiments.
3. Small-Scale Structure Suppression: While axions’ impact on large-scale structure formation is consistent with observations, their ability to suppress structure formation at smaller scales (such as in dwarf galaxies) has yet to be conclusively validated. This could be a challenge if axions are too light, as they might leave fewer structures or fail to form halos in ways that align with observations.

The constraints from the CMB, large-scale galaxy surveys, direct detection experiments, and astrophysical observations suggest that axions could contribute to dark matter, but their ultra-light mass poses challenges for direct detection and for reconciling all these findings. While their small mass allows them to fit with cosmological data and structure formation at large scales, their axion-photon coupling must be very weak to avoid conflicts with astrophysical limits. As a result, axions remain a viable but challenging candidate for dark matter, and more precise experiments and observations will be needed to further refine their properties and determine their role in the dark matter puzzle.

The “large-scale structure” (LSS) of the universe refers to the distribution of galaxies, clusters, superclusters, and voids across the cosmos. These structures provide critical insights into the nature of dark matter (DM), as it is thought to play a fundamental role in the formation and evolution of these structures. The presence of dark matter (including various models like cold dark matter (CDM) and self-interacting dark matter (SIDM)) has significant implications for LSS, and discrepancies between the predictions of cosmological simulations and actual observations have raised important questions about the properties of dark matter. Below, I explore how the LSS challenges our understanding of dark matter properties, particularly in the context of SIDM, and how future surveys like the EUCLID mission can help resolve these tensions.

Large-Scale Structure and Dark Matter

• The LSS of the universe includes the formation of galaxy clusters, superclusters, and voids, which are large regions of space with relatively few galaxies. The formation of these structures is governed by the interplay between gravity and the distribution of dark matter. Dark matter is believed to have provided the gravitational scaffolding for the formation of galaxies and clusters, which then evolved into the structures we observe today.

Challenges for Our Understanding of Dark Matter Properties

1. Cold Dark Matter (CDM) and the “Core-Cusp” Problem

• Cold dark matter (CDM) is the leading candidate for dark matter, assuming it interacts weakly with ordinary matter and itself. CDM predicts the formation of cuspy halos—dense, concentrated regions of dark matter at the center of galaxies and clusters.
• However, observations of galactic halos show a core (i.e., a more spread-out, less concentrated distribution of dark matter) rather than the predicted cusp. This discrepancy is known as the core-cusp problem.
• The formation of large-scale structures like superclusters and voids is influenced by the behavior of dark matter at smaller scales. The core-cusp problem raises the possibility that dark matter behaves differently than predicted by standard CDM, particularly in smaller systems like dwarf galaxies.

2. Self-Interacting Dark Matter (SIDM)

• Self-interacting dark matter (SIDM) proposes that dark matter particles interact with each other via a new force, in addition to gravity. These interactions would cause dark matter to redistribute within galaxies and clusters, smoothing out the central density profiles and potentially resolving the core-cusp problem.
• SIDM models predict that dark matter halos should have a less cuspy and more uniform distribution in the centers of galaxies and that they could affect the dynamics of galaxy formation and clustering. This would also influence the observed LSS, particularly in terms of the clustering of galaxies and the distribution of voids.

3. Tension Between Simulations and Observations

• Cosmological simulations based on CDM predict that dark matter should form very dense halos around galaxies, leading to structures like galaxy clusters with a high concentration of dark matter at the center.
• Observations of galaxy clusters and other large-scale structures, however, do not always match these predictions, particularly at smaller scales. This tension points to the possibility that dark matter interactions (such as those in SIDM) might be altering the way galaxies and clusters form, leading to a less concentrated distribution of dark matter and a smoothing of smaller-scale structures.

Role of Future Surveys, Like EUCLID

The EUCLID mission, set to launch in the near future, will be one of the most important tools for resolving tensions between cosmological simulations and observations of large-scale structure. Here’s how it will help:

1. Measuring the Distribution of Galaxies and Clusters

• EUCLID is designed to measure the distribution of galaxies and galaxy clusters across large areas of the sky with great precision. By accurately mapping out the 3D distribution of galaxies and clusters, EUCLID will provide data that can be compared to simulations of structure formation under different dark matter models.
• By comparing the observed distribution of galaxies and clusters to predictions made by simulations using SIDM and CDM, EUCLID will help identify which model most accurately explains the observed data. The mission will offer insights into how dark matter affects the growth of structures at large scales.

2. Constraining Dark Matter Properties

• EUCLID will also help constrain the properties of dark matter, including its interaction rate and mass, by providing detailed data on the growth of cosmic structures and how they evolve over time.
• The mission will focus on measuring the distortions in the cosmic structure due to the presence of dark energy and dark matter. By studying the shape of galaxy clusters and superclusters, voids, and the large-scale distribution of galaxies, EUCLID will help test whether dark matter behaves as predicted by CDM or whether SIDM models are needed to explain the observed discrepancies.

3. Mapping Cosmic Voids and the Impact of Dark Matter

• One of the key areas where SIDM may differ from CDM is in the formation and distribution of voids—large regions of space with very few galaxies.
• SIDM would lead to a different distribution of dark matter in the universe, which in turn would affect the number, size, and distribution of voids. EUCLID‘s precision in mapping these voids will help determine whether the void distribution matches predictions from simulations based on CDM or whether alternative models like SIDM can better explain the observed patterns.

4. Weak Lensing and Gravitational Effects

• EUCLID will measure weak gravitational lensing, where the gravitational influence of large structures (such as galaxy clusters) bends the light from more distant objects. This technique is sensitive to the distribution of dark matter because it measures how dark matter affects the curvature of space-time.
• This will allow EUCLID to provide direct measurements of the dark matter content in galaxy clusters and large-scale structures. The way that dark matter halos are distributed around galaxies and clusters will help constrain whether SIDM or CDM better explains the observed data.

The large-scale structure of the universe presents a critical challenge to our understanding of dark matter, particularly in terms of the formation of superclusters and voids. The tension between predictions from cold dark matter (CDM) simulations and actual observations of galactic clustering and the distribution of voids has led to the exploration of alternative models, such as self-interacting dark matter (SIDM).

Future surveys, particularly the EUCLID mission, will play a pivotal role in resolving these tensions. By providing detailed measurements of the distribution of galaxies, voids, and galaxy clusters, along with weak lensing data, EUCLID will offer new insights into the nature of dark matter, testing the predictions of both SIDM and CDM models. Ultimately, these findings will help to refine our understanding of the cosmological parameters that govern the growth of structures in the universe and lead to a better grasp of dark matter’s role in shaping the cosmos.