Sign up to our innovative Q&A platform to pose your queries, share your wisdom, and engage with a community of inquisitive minds.
Log in to our dynamic platform to ask insightful questions, provide valuable answers, and connect with a vibrant community of curious minds.
Forgot your password? No worries, we're here to help! Simply enter your email address, and we'll send you a link. Click the link, and you'll receive another email with a temporary password. Use that password to log in and set up your new one!
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Which one of the following is correct in respect to Article 335 of India Constitution?
Statement 1 is accurate, as established by the Supreme Court in the M. Nagaraj case (2006), which introduced a threefold test to determine the validity of reservations in promotions: Demonstration of backwardness, Insufficient representation, and Assurance that such reservations do not compromise thRead more
Statement 1 is accurate, as established by the Supreme Court in the M. Nagaraj case (2006), which introduced a threefold test to determine the validity of reservations in promotions:
Statement 2 is incorrect. While Article 335 references “efficiency of administration,” it does not provide a formal definition for this term. The article states that the claims of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes must be considered while ensuring the maintenance of administrative efficiency during appointments to various services and positions within the Union or state governments. It further allows for provisions that may relax qualifying marks in examinations or lower evaluation standards for promoting reservations in public service roles related to the Union or state affairs.
Conclusion:
Statement I is correct, but Statement II is incorrect.
See lessWhich Constitutional Amendment in India was enacted to address judicial interpretations of Fundamental Rights?
The correct answer is 1st Amendment. Explanation: The 1st Amendment to the Indian Constitution, enacted in 1951, was widely believed to be introduced to overcome certain judicial interpretations of Fundamental Rights, particularly in the areas of freedom of speech and expression, right to property,Read more
The correct answer is 1st Amendment.
Explanation: The 1st Amendment to the Indian Constitution, enacted in 1951, was widely believed to be introduced to overcome certain judicial interpretations of Fundamental Rights, particularly in the areas of freedom of speech and expression, right to property, and special provisions for backward classes. The amendment was brought in response to judicial decisions that invalidated laws related to land reform and restrictions on free speech, which the government considered necessary for social and economic progress.
See less