Sign up to our innovative Q&A platform to pose your queries, share your wisdom, and engage with a community of inquisitive minds.
Log in to our dynamic platform to ask insightful questions, provide valuable answers, and connect with a vibrant community of curious minds.
Forgot your password? No worries, we're here to help! Simply enter your email address, and we'll send you a link. Click the link, and you'll receive another email with a temporary password. Use that password to log in and set up your new one!
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
If a quad in a K-map appears redundant when grouping is done without wrapping, but becomes useful and necessary after applying wrap-around grouping, should we use the wrapping method and include that quad in the final simplified expression?
If a quad in a K-map appears redundant when grouping is done without wrapping, but becomes useful and necessary after applying wrap-around grouping, should we use the wrapping method and include that quad in the final simplified expression?
Read less
