Which among the following (Provision — Part of the Constitution) is not correctly matched? [2023]
Which among the following (Provision — Part of the Constitution) is not correctly matched? [2023]
Read lessSign up to our innovative Q&A platform to pose your queries, share your wisdom, and engage with a community of inquisitive minds.
Log in to our dynamic platform to ask insightful questions, provide valuable answers, and connect with a vibrant community of curious minds.
Forgot your password? No worries, we're here to help! Simply enter your email address, and we'll send you a link. Click the link, and you'll receive another email with a temporary password. Use that password to log in and set up your new one!
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
What are the fundamental principles of constitutional law?
What are the fundamental principles of constitutional law?
Read lessThe fundamental principles of constitutional law are the core concepts that define and govern the relationship between the government and its citizens, as well as the framework of governmental powers and their limitations. These principles ensure that the rule of law is upheld and that individual riRead more
The fundamental principles of constitutional law are the core concepts that define and govern the relationship between the government and its citizens, as well as the framework of governmental powers and their limitations. These principles ensure that the rule of law is upheld and that individual rights are protected within a legal framework. Below are the key principles of constitutional law:
These principles form the backbone of constitutional law, ensuring that a government operates in a structured, fair, and accountable manner while protecting individual rights and upholding the rule of law.
See lessConsider the following statements: ...Read more
Consider the following statements: [2023]
Statement-I: The Supreme Court of India has held in some judgements that the reservation policies made under Article 16(4) of the Constitution of India would be limited by Article 335 for maintenance of efficiency of administration.
Statement-II: Article 335 of the Constitution of India defines the term ‘efficiency of administration’.
Read less
Let's analyze the statements: Statement I: The Supreme Court of India has held in some judgments that reservation policies made under Article 16(4) would be limited by Article 335 to maintain the efficiency of administration. This is correct. The Supreme Court, in various rulings (such as the IndraRead more
Let’s analyze the statements:
Statement I:
The Supreme Court of India has held in some judgments that reservation policies made under Article 16(4) would be limited by Article 335 to maintain the efficiency of administration.
This is correct. The Supreme Court, in various rulings (such as the Indra Sawhney case), has emphasized that while Article 16(4) provides for reservations in public employment, it must be balanced with Article 335, which states that the claims of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes must be consistent with maintaining the efficiency of administration.
Statement II:
Article 335 defines the term “efficiency of administration.”
This is incorrect. Article 335 does not define “efficiency of administration.” It only mentions that the claims of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes should be taken into consideration, consistent with the maintenance of efficiency of administration. However, it does not provide a definition of “efficiency.”
Correct answer:
Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect
With reference to ‘Scheduled Areas’ in India, consider the following statements: [2023]1. Within a State, the notification of an area as Scheduled Area takes place through an Order of the President.Read more
With reference to ‘Scheduled Areas’ in India, consider the following statements: [2023]
1. Within a State, the notification of an area as Scheduled Area takes place through an Order of the President.
2. The largest administrative unit forming the Scheduled Area is the District and the lowest is the cluster of villages in the Block.
3. The Chief Ministers of the concerned States are required to submit annual reports to the Union Home Ministry on the administration of Scheduled Areas in the States.
Statement 1 is accurate since, under Schedule V (Article 244) of the Indian Constitution, the President is empowered to declare specific regions as Scheduled Areas. Paragraph VI of the Fifth Schedule explicitly states that the term "Scheduled Areas" refers to those areas that the President may declaRead more
Statement 1 is accurate since, under Schedule V (Article 244) of the Indian Constitution, the President is empowered to declare specific regions as Scheduled Areas. Paragraph VI of the Fifth Schedule explicitly states that the term “Scheduled Areas” refers to those areas that the President may declare through an official order.
Statement 2 is also correct. In April 2018, the Union Cabinet approved the declaration of certain areas in Rajasthan as Scheduled Areas under the Fifth Schedule. This included three entire districts—Banswara, Dungarpur, Pratapgarh—along with nine complete tehsils, one block, and 46 full gram panchayats across multiple districts like Udaipur, Rajsamand, Chittorgarh, Pali, and Sirohi. It is important to note that while a block can consist of a cluster of villages, individual villages from within a block can be grouped together to form the smallest administrative unit within the Scheduled Areas framework.
Statement 3 is incorrect. According to the Constitution, the Governor of a state with Scheduled Areas is responsible for submitting annual reports to the President regarding the management and governance of those areas. Additionally, the President may require such a report at any time. Furthermore, the Union Government holds the authority to issue directions to state governments regarding the administration of these areas.
Therefore, the correct answer is Only two.
See lessWith reference to Finance Bill and Money Bill in the Indian Parliament, consider the following statements: ...Read more
With reference to Finance Bill and Money Bill in the Indian Parliament, consider the following statements: [2023]
1. When the Lok Sabha transmits Finance Bill to the Rajya Sabha, it can amend or reject the Bill.
2. When the Lok Sabha transmits Money Bill to the Rajya Sabha, it cannot amend or reject the Bill, it can only make recommendations.
3. In the case of disagreement between the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, there is no joint sitting for Money Bill, but a joint sitting becomes necessary for Finance Bill.
Here is the analysis of the three statements: Statement 1: "When the Lok Sabha transmits Finance Bill to the Rajya Sabha, it can amend or reject the Bill." This statement is incorrect because, as per the text, a Finance Bill is a Money Bill, and the Rajya Sabha cannot amend or reject it. The Rajya SRead more
Here is the analysis of the three statements:
Conclusion:
Thus, the correct answer is Only one.
See lessConsider the following statements: ...Read more
Consider the following statements: [2023]
1. If the election of the President of India is declared void by the Supreme Court of India, all acts done by him/her in the performance of duties of his/her office of President before the date of decision become invalid.2. Election for the post of the President of India can be postponed on the ground that some Legislative Assemblies have been dissolved and elections are yet to take placed
3. When a Bill is presented to the President of India, the Constitution prescribes time limits within which he/she has to declare his/her assent.
Statement 1 is incorrect because, as per Article 71(2) of the Indian Constitution, the actions performed by a person in the capacity of President or Vice-President remain valid even if their election is declared void by the Supreme Court. Article 71(2) explicitly states that such acts shall not be iRead more
Statement 1 is incorrect because, as per Article 71(2) of the Indian Constitution, the actions performed by a person in the capacity of President or Vice-President remain valid even if their election is declared void by the Supreme Court. Article 71(2) explicitly states that such acts shall not be invalidated due to the court’s declaration. It reads: “If the election of a person as President or Vice-President is declared void by the Supreme Court, acts done by him in the exercise and performance of the powers and duties of the office of President or Vice-President, as the case may be, on or before the date of the decision of the Supreme Court shall not be invalidated by reason of that declaration.”
Statement 2 is also incorrect. The Constitution of India does not have any provision allowing for the postponement of the Presidential election due to the dissolution of some Legislative Assemblies. The election must be held within the prescribed time, regardless of such dissolutions.
Statement 3 is incorrect because Article 111 of the Constitution, which outlines the process of granting or withholding assent to bills, does not impose a specific time limit for the President to act on a bill. Article 111 states: “When a Bill has been passed by the Houses of Parliament, it shall be presented to the President, and the President shall declare either that he assents to the Bill, or that he withholds assent therefrom.” There is no mention of a time frame within which the President is required to make this decision. The President may, however, return a non-Money Bill for reconsideration by Parliament, but even here, the Constitution does not set a specific deadline for the President’s assent.
See lessConsider the following organizations/ bodies in India: [2023]1. The National Commission ...Read more
Consider the following organizations/ bodies in India: [2023]
1. The National Commission for Backward Classes
2. The National Human Rights Commission
3. The National Law Commissions
4. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
The correct answer is Only one. Explanation: Out of the given organizations/bodies, only the National Commission for Backward Classes is a constitutional body. It was given constitutional status by the 102nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 2018, under Article 338B. The National Human Rights CommissionRead more
The correct answer is Only one.
Explanation: Out of the given organizations/bodies, only the National Commission for Backward Classes is a constitutional body. It was given constitutional status by the 102nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 2018, under Article 338B.
Thus, only one of the listed bodies is a constitutional body.
See lessIn India, which one of the following Constitutional Amendments was widely believed to be enacted to overcome the judicial interpretations of the Fundamental Rights? ...Read more
In India, which one of the following Constitutional Amendments was widely believed to be enacted to overcome the judicial interpretations of the Fundamental Rights? [2023]
Read lessThe Supreme Court has agreed to review a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the modifications made to the right to freedom of speech and expression through the First Amendment to the Indian Constitution in 1951. The petitioner claims that this amendment undermines the basic structure doctrRead more
The Supreme Court has agreed to review a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the modifications made to the right to freedom of speech and expression through the First Amendment to the Indian Constitution in 1951. The petitioner claims that this amendment undermines the basic structure doctrine. In the first year of the Constitution’s implementation, certain judicial decisions, such as the Shankari Prasad case, created challenges, particularly regarding the fundamental rights chapter. To address these issues, Parliament enacted the First Constitutional Amendment, introducing Articles 19(2), 31A, and 31B.
Issues in the first year of the Constitution:
• Some courts interpreted Article 19(1)(a), which guarantees the right to freedom of speech and expression, as so broad that individuals were not held accountable even if they advocated violent crimes, including murder. In contrast, other countries with written constitutions allow restrictions on free speech to prevent misuse.
• Article 19(1)(g), which confers the right to practice any profession or business, is subject to reasonable limitations in the “interests of the general public.” While these terms are broad enough to support state-led nationalization schemes, it was considered necessary to add clarity through a modification to Article 19(6).
• Article 31 also presented unforeseen challenges. Despite clauses (4) and (6) of Article 31, agrarian reform laws passed by state legislatures over the previous three years had faced legal delays, prevented their timely execution and affected large populations.
The First Constitutional Amendment sought primarily to modify Article 19 to address the above concerns, as well as to ensure the constitutional validity of land reform laws, particularly zamindari abolition laws, in various states. Additionally, a few minor changes were proposed to other articles to prevent potential future issues.
The correct answer is It defines and limits the powers of government. Explanation: The primary purpose of a constitution is to establish the fundamental framework for governance in a country. It defines the structure of the government, delineates the powers and functions of different institutions, aRead more
The correct answer is It defines and limits the powers of government.
Explanation: The primary purpose of a constitution is to establish the fundamental framework for governance in a country. It defines the structure of the government, delineates the powers and functions of different institutions, and places limits on governmental power to protect individual rights and maintain the rule of law. While it may also outline the objectives for making laws, create political offices, and aim to secure social justice, its chief purpose is to define and limit the powers of government to prevent abuse and ensure the protection of citizens’ rights.
See lessConsider the following statements: ...Read more
Consider the following statements: [2023]
Statement-I: In India, prisons are managed by State Governments with their own rules and regulations for the day-to-day administration of prisons.
Statement-II: In India, prisons are governed by the Prisons Act, 1894 which expressly kept the subject of prisons in the control of Provincial Governments.
The correct answer is Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I. Explanation: Statement-I is correct because prisons in India are managed by State Governments, and each state has its own rules and regulations for the administration of pRead more
The correct answer is Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I.
Explanation:
The incorrect match is Tribunals — Part XI Explanation: Part VIII: Deals with The Union Territories. Part X: Deals with The Scheduled and Tribal Areas. Part XI: Relates to the Relations between the Union and the States, not Tribunals. Tribunals are addressed under Part XIV-A of the Constitution. InRead more
The incorrect match is Tribunals — Part XI
Explanation:
Thus, the mismatched pair is Tribunals — Part XI.
See less